Its Christmas Eve.....there is a lot of different meanings in those two words culturally and religiously.
Today my aim is to join the religious cult of restfulness.
A few loose ends to tidy up today, I will be the only one in town smiling not frowning as I refuse to be dragged into the tension of Xmas ( I hope there are a few more smiling).
Some tucker to pick up, gas bottle for the BBQ and some book keeping so that Glenn's BAS is done on time.
My brother turns up tonight, I'm looking forward to a cool ale on mum's veranda with him
-I haven't seen him in almost a year I think it was March when Tannar and I caught the train to Brisbane for cousin Jessica's wedding-but you know that could have been last year- time seems to not make sense sometimes, especially when I loose track of it!
Last night Glenn, the girls and I sat on the bench seat at the farm talking about the meaning we put into Xmas and how all year is like it. Special happenings, shopping for needed items, holidays, days when mum decides we should have a feast, when our lives are so spectacularly blessed all of the time you can see why the 'build up' for Xmas can be so intense. Buy Buy Buy catalogues, everyone talking about the shopping list, tension building, family strain, I'm really very glad that our little family has managed to keep that at bay and make our holidays about family and friends.
Last Xmas the girls taught me how to make friendship bracelet's and we sat around in hot moments with our heads down weaving colourful bands for friends, trying new designs and colour combos. I'm sure we will find something equally crafty to do this summer, for when our heads are down and we are hanging out together is when we have some fine conversation.Of course there will be lots of swimming, a bot of time spent on the tractor and lots of time spent with friends.
Oh and we have to work out our 7 minutes of heaven routine which takes around 40 Min's and is a family fitness routine we set ourselves so that we don't become to slovenly, its a bit of a laugh really and there is lots of noise and moans.
It will be so nice to give my head a rest. Its so very tiring behaving like a microwave...issues in..ping..a debate or ping...an opinion.
I much prefer to be a crock pot- or slow cooker...issue in...mm...might add a pinch of something else......do I like that .....no it needs a little tweaking.......ahhh now that's a much more satisfactory position........time to think of the angles, reaction vs action, cause and effect, contemplation, call it what you will but often times there is little space for this.
So whatever the holiday season brings to you...may it be safe and may you join the cult of restfulness.
Monday, December 24, 2012
Monday, December 17, 2012
Planning Minister Throws Out Shoalhaven Spot Rezoning
I've got a lot more to say on this issue but here is a copy of the press release I put out today.
|
|
The
Shoalhaven Green are delighted to see Planning Minister Brad Hazzard take steps
to get the Draft Shoalhaven Local Environment Plan 2009 back on track and more
reflective of community concerns.
‘The
Minister has advised Council that many of the spot rezoning’s that were awarded
during the Council’s consideration of the community submissions simply cannot
be supported’ said Greens Councillor Amanda Findley.
‘I feel
personally vindicated that the stance I took to not award the spot rezoning’s
has been validated by the Minister’ said Clr Findley.
‘During the
course of the many Council meetings to consider the submission, I was subjected
to a continual stream of Green bashing, my stance on these matters was labelled
anti-development and I was often negatively characterised by fellow
Councillors, so for a Liberal Planning Minister to now seek Council’s
cooperation in rolling back non-strategic rezoning’s is a great step forward
for better planning in the Shoalhaven.’
“Along with
then Clr John Fergusson we were the consistent voices for the Shoalhaven to
follow strategic and state recognised plans such as the Nowra /Bomaderry
structure plan, the South Coast Sensitive Urban Land Review and the South Coast
strategy.’ said Clr Findley.
‘Im pleased
also that Mayor Gash has given consideration to the Ministers comments and
seems willing to roll back the inappropriate up-zonings’.
‘On an
environmental level is great to see the Minister doesn’t support
intensification of housing in flood prone lands, and that Minister Hazzard also
supports the protection of environmentally sensitive lands’.
“The use of
the Local Environment Planning template is not without its problems and there
are still a number of issues that need further strengthening, but the
Minister’s letter can give all Shoalhaven residents confidence that there is
broad support for a more sustainable model for our area’.
Amanda
Findley : Greens Councillor: Ward 3: Shoalhaven City Council: 0434 151 730 or
44543257
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Gash-Doesn't want to hear the reality!!!
At a Councillors briefing yesterday (Monday 10 December 2012), Council staff were advising Councillors on the progress of the Shaolin Temple- Part 3A application for Comberton Grange.
The Shaolin Temple project has been around for about 6 years and has been subject to community scepticism and questions about the Comberton Grange Land sale.
Council staff advised Councillors that the environmental assessments that were part of the application were lacking as were the traffic reports.
Of course Councillor Watson butted in with his sentiments- 'If you make them do any more studies we will loose the project'. 'They have already spent a $1mill and should not have to spend any more'. and 'If Council wants to kill the temple then this is the way to go about it'.
My response to this was that the community expected Council to act on its behalf and to be thorough in its representations to the State government.
About 15 minutes into the briefing Mayor Gash exploded, her face as red as beet- pushing her chair back as though to leave she said raged 'I don't want to hear this, its ridiculous, I want to hear how we can help, this presentation is so negative'.
I couldn't let this intimidation and bullying go through to the keeper and raged back 'Did Madame Mayor only want the staff to present 'happy' reports instead of offering up frank and fearless reports about Councils responsability'. It was a very subdued 'no' in response as Clr Gash has already demanded that staff make their reports shorter so that it doesn't take so long to get through reading the paper!
I hope that the community campaigners, especially on the environmental side of things are prepared with their submission for there certainly is no appetite from Council to make further representation on environmental issues. The Councillors are of the belief that Environmentalists will make enough noise that Council wont need to.
Seems that Shaolin have overwhelming support from Gash, Watson, Wells and Kitchener has now weighed in with his support-saying its an excellent project.
If the project is so good and will generate the so called big bucks for tourism-then why should it not be compliant in all forms of legislation including environmental legislation, heritage and culture.
Nowra CBD Action-The Tail that wags the dog?
 |
| Junction Court- Photo by Graham French from the Power Fm website |
At the CBD Action meeting - the property owners wanted Council to suspend its current planned capital works - like the upgrade of the Nowra Pool, Basketball stadium and the Ulladulla Civic Centre and to re prioritise the projects important to the CBD group.
The Action group also inferred that it was Councils responsibility to implement the graffiti program although I did submit to them a paper giving suggestions for a way forward. Seems that perhaps the CBD ratepayers are not willing to help themselves-I hope not as it was positive to hear that some private sites had been identified for murals. Council has a role to play and perhaps submitting a funding submission to the Attorney Generals anti graffiti program is part of that commitment.
Thankfully Clr Gemma Tribe was able to guide this bunch to a much more palatable motion than the original version that was offered up- moved by Paul Dean and seconded by Lance Sewell.
What I find most irritating about these types of meetings is the following.
This small minority of ratepayers are considered by the neo-liberals to be of far greater importance than the majority of ratepayers in the Shoalhaven. They seem completely oblivious to the fact that council should be working for the 'greatest good' and that if Council does so that the flow on will benefit their own long term viability. The sycophantic approach to this group of rate payers by some is galling to watch as they completely ignore broad ranging community consultation on the other hand.
The most recent meeting was help Monday 3 December- Clr John Wells was appointed chair and Councillors Gash, Tribe, Wells, Findley and Guile attended.
Community members of CBD Action are mostly from the Nowra CBD ratepayers group and in attendance were Stephen Nall, Paul Dean, David Goodman, Peter Price, Lee Carmichael, Lance Sewell, Scott Baxter and Mark Crowther- there are a few other members who were unable to attend.
The CBD ratepayers have a few major issues which they seem to think rank far higher than the issues of the rest of the city. They are concerned that there rates are too high, they want increased all day parking by way of a multi million multi storey car park. The want additional services to the CBD including cleaning and refreshed street scaping and of course the never ending need for all to remove graffiti.
Prior to the election the CBD ratepayers invited mayoral candidates to give their position on the above items and because I had the hide to disagree with their position they booed and laughed at me, but that didn't stop me from telling them what they didn't want to hear.
Council is doing its bit and keeping its properties graffiti free - but it has trouble compelling private property holders to do the same.
I don't believe that the CBD ratepayers should be getting a rate cut that will eventually affect the residential ratepayers of the city. The increased rates that they pay goes mostly towards advertising the business that occupy the CBD properties, campaigns to increase tourist visitation and increased services in the CBD-that includes frequent cleaning of toilets and high quality finishes to the main street footpaths and projects like junction court. All of these additional services make the CBD a more desirable place to rent at high end cost.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Novembers Notices of Motion
Novembers notices of motion
Conjola Boardwalk
That the boardwalk project at Lake Conjola be replaced on a like for like basis I.e. it be replaced with an elevated accessible boardwalk that protects vegetation and provides easy access to the beach.
Background
The Lake Conjola beach boardwalk is falling apart and needs replacement. There has been a suggestion that this be done 'at grade' the community are outraged at this prospect and request that it be replaced like for like. The community needs to be consulted on any changes and appropriate funding should be sought from current budgets and infrastructure grants.
Signed
Clr Findley
Supported by all Councillors after a minor amendment from Clr White.
61. Skateboard Facility – Yulunga Reserve, Manyana File 2069E
A report be brought to Council addressing the development of a small skateboard facility at Yulunga Reserve Manyana.
Background
Manyana, Bendalong, Cunjarong Point are a cluster of small villages that are quite a distance from any of Councils skateboarding facilities. The Yulunga reserve is a focal point for the community with the community centre, playground, tennis court and sport field and the addition of a small skate facility would be a great addition for the young permanent population. This motion seeks a report on the feasibility of such a facility and the costs associated.
Signed
Clr Findley
Supported by all Councillors
62. Future Park / Aquaculture Recreational Research Centre Ulladulla File
Council convene a briefing on the Future Park / Aquaculture Recreational Research Centre Ulladulla with the various stakeholders i.e. The local committee, economic development officer, Shoal Water, Councils development staff, Fisheries NSW and Regional development representative. The briefing is to update Councillors on the project, with a view to reaffirming Councils support for the project and subsequently to extend the deadline for investigation and discuss remediation of the site with Shoal Water.
Background
This project has been gaining momentum and is widely supported across the community, however some 'Catch 22's" exist before the project can move forward. At a recent committee meeting it was put forward that the current Council be brought up to date and some discussion take place on 'were to from here'. The time frame for exploring the concept expires in 2013 and for continuity an extension needs to be sought.
Signed
Clr Findley
I was unable to vote on this motion as I took on the role of Public Officer for this not for profit community group. However it was supported by the majority of Council.
63. Development Control Plan Reform File
Index
That Council
1. Recognises the importance of Council's Development Control Plans which are the fine-grained planning regulations that set out important planning controls to protect the amenity and character of local areas.
2. Notes with genuine concern that the Government's proposed Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Bill 2012 will make a number of changes which will greatly reduce the capacity of DCPs to protect local amenity and character including:
(a) Proposed changes will prevent councils from considering the cumulative impact of developments.
(b) Proposed changes so that maximum entitlements under DCPs such as the height and size of buildings will become "as of right entitlements" rather than the maximum allowable.
(c) Providing developers with a "get out of jail free card" if they don't want to comply with DCPs if the DCP is thought to "unreasonably restrict development";
3. Notes that this proposed change comes in the middle of a State-wide review of planning in NSW and pre-empts the outcome of this process.
4. Expresses its concern that these proposed laws are in breach of this government's "Contract with NSW" where the current Premier promised that his government would 'return planning powers to the community' and 'give communities a say again in the shape of their community'.
5. Calls on the Government to not proceed with those aspects of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Bill 2012 that limit and restrict Development Control Plans.
6. Asks the Mayor to write to the Minister for Planning, local state representatives and planning spokespeople for the Labor Party, the Greens, The Shooters and Fishers Party and the Christian Democrats seeking their support to prevent these aspects of the Bill becoming law.
Signed
Clr Findley
This motion was substantially changed by Councillor Guile and then failed to get the support fo Council. I was surprised in the seeming lack of engagement of other Councillors on state issues that ultimately have a huge impact upon our communities.
Eventually though a report was brought to Development Committee rather than the breifing that Clr Guile insisted on in his amendments and Council did end up supporting that a letter be sent to the NSW State Governement expressing our concerns over the lack of consultation in regards to the changes to development control plans.
Conjola Boardwalk
That the boardwalk project at Lake Conjola be replaced on a like for like basis I.e. it be replaced with an elevated accessible boardwalk that protects vegetation and provides easy access to the beach.
Background
The Lake Conjola beach boardwalk is falling apart and needs replacement. There has been a suggestion that this be done 'at grade' the community are outraged at this prospect and request that it be replaced like for like. The community needs to be consulted on any changes and appropriate funding should be sought from current budgets and infrastructure grants.
Signed
Clr Findley
Supported by all Councillors after a minor amendment from Clr White.
61. Skateboard Facility – Yulunga Reserve, Manyana File 2069E
A report be brought to Council addressing the development of a small skateboard facility at Yulunga Reserve Manyana.
Background
Manyana, Bendalong, Cunjarong Point are a cluster of small villages that are quite a distance from any of Councils skateboarding facilities. The Yulunga reserve is a focal point for the community with the community centre, playground, tennis court and sport field and the addition of a small skate facility would be a great addition for the young permanent population. This motion seeks a report on the feasibility of such a facility and the costs associated.
Signed
Clr Findley
Supported by all Councillors
62. Future Park / Aquaculture Recreational Research Centre Ulladulla File
Council convene a briefing on the Future Park / Aquaculture Recreational Research Centre Ulladulla with the various stakeholders i.e. The local committee, economic development officer, Shoal Water, Councils development staff, Fisheries NSW and Regional development representative. The briefing is to update Councillors on the project, with a view to reaffirming Councils support for the project and subsequently to extend the deadline for investigation and discuss remediation of the site with Shoal Water.
Background
This project has been gaining momentum and is widely supported across the community, however some 'Catch 22's" exist before the project can move forward. At a recent committee meeting it was put forward that the current Council be brought up to date and some discussion take place on 'were to from here'. The time frame for exploring the concept expires in 2013 and for continuity an extension needs to be sought.
Signed
Clr Findley
I was unable to vote on this motion as I took on the role of Public Officer for this not for profit community group. However it was supported by the majority of Council.
63. Development Control Plan Reform File
Index
That Council
1. Recognises the importance of Council's Development Control Plans which are the fine-grained planning regulations that set out important planning controls to protect the amenity and character of local areas.
2. Notes with genuine concern that the Government's proposed Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Bill 2012 will make a number of changes which will greatly reduce the capacity of DCPs to protect local amenity and character including:
(a) Proposed changes will prevent councils from considering the cumulative impact of developments.
(b) Proposed changes so that maximum entitlements under DCPs such as the height and size of buildings will become "as of right entitlements" rather than the maximum allowable.
(c) Providing developers with a "get out of jail free card" if they don't want to comply with DCPs if the DCP is thought to "unreasonably restrict development";
3. Notes that this proposed change comes in the middle of a State-wide review of planning in NSW and pre-empts the outcome of this process.
4. Expresses its concern that these proposed laws are in breach of this government's "Contract with NSW" where the current Premier promised that his government would 'return planning powers to the community' and 'give communities a say again in the shape of their community'.
5. Calls on the Government to not proceed with those aspects of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Bill 2012 that limit and restrict Development Control Plans.
6. Asks the Mayor to write to the Minister for Planning, local state representatives and planning spokespeople for the Labor Party, the Greens, The Shooters and Fishers Party and the Christian Democrats seeking their support to prevent these aspects of the Bill becoming law.
Signed
Clr Findley
This motion was substantially changed by Councillor Guile and then failed to get the support fo Council. I was surprised in the seeming lack of engagement of other Councillors on state issues that ultimately have a huge impact upon our communities.
Eventually though a report was brought to Development Committee rather than the breifing that Clr Guile insisted on in his amendments and Council did end up supporting that a letter be sent to the NSW State Governement expressing our concerns over the lack of consultation in regards to the changes to development control plans.
October 2012 Notices of Motion:
One way for Councillors to bring items onto the agenda is via the Notice of Motion. At Shoalhaven we have to give seven days notice. Sometimes the General Manager makes comments on the content of motions and sometimes other Councillors will offer amendments in order to support or to stall the motion. Many of the motions that I have put up over the years fail to recieve support unless of course they are fairly gentle in nature. I will aim to put up each months motions and the result-if they have been supported or not. Following are Octobers motions. 59. Bus stop - Wandandian File 27829E
Council work with the Wandandian Progress Association to assess the safety of the current location of the current bus stop, and the community desire to relocate it. Any subsequent budget issues be reported back to Council for consideration along with avenues for safety funding.
Background
The Wandandian progress association has brought to my attention their desire to relocate the current bus stop to safer location. This notice of motion seeks to start a formal process of negotiation with the community and affected stakeholders to seek a solution. It has also come to my attention that funding may be available through the roads safety officer for improved safety around bus stops, it is therefore the intent for any funding opportunities to be sought to complete any project that should come from the consultation.
Signed
Clr Findley
Supported by all Councillors
67. Strategic Regional Land Use Policy and zero protection for Shoalhaven Agricultural Land File 1753E
That Council:
1. Note the NSW Government’s renewal offer for PEL 469 which covers much of the Shoalhaven LGA.
2. Expresses its disappointment that the NSW Government’s Strategic Regional Land Use Policy has failed to deliver adequate protections for productive agricultural areas and sensitive environmental areas.
3. Makes clear its opposition to CSG development within the Shoalhaven LGA.
4. Expresses its interest in being actively consulted and involved in the updating of the South Coast Regional Strategy as highlighted in the new policy.
5. Calls on the NSW Government to release the scientific evidence relied upon to lift the moratorium on Fracking.
6. Calls on the NSW Government to give local councils a greater say over extractive industry activities within LGA’s.
7. Write to the NSW Planning and Infrastructure and Resources and Energy Ministers detailing these actions.
Background
The NSW Government has recently released its Strategic Regional Land Use Policy (
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DkJI33ytuKs%3d&tabid=495&language=en-US) , which in the words of many has effectively green-lighted the coal seam gas (CSG) industry in NSW. The NSW Farmers Association have stated they are "bitterly disappointed" (http://www.nswfarmers.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/79609/088.mr.12.pdf) by the policy and the NSW Irrigators Council is "profoundly disappointed" (http://www.nswic.org.au/pdf/press_release/2012/120911%20NSW.pdf).
The main concerns about the policy are that no areas are ruled out from coal mining or CSG development meaning all quality agricultural land is still exposed to possible mining and gas extraction. The proposed Aquifer Interference Regulation has been downgraded to a policy failing to adequately protect groundwater sources. The moratorium on hydraulic fracturing (Fracking) has also been lifted but none of the science relied on to justify this change in policy has been made public.
The policy also makes clear that the South Coast will not get its own Strategic Regional Land Use Plan, instead the Government has committed to updating our South Coast Regional Strategy. I am not aware of any consultation that has been undertaken by the NSW Government with Shoalhaven City Council in relation to this commitment.
# At the same time as the Government announced the new policy, it offered a renewal (
http://www.resources.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/443123/Proposed-petroleum-exploration-licence-offers-of-renewal.pdf) of the petroleum exploration licence (PEL) 469 that covers the Shoalhaven and Southern Highlands Local Government Area (LGA). The Leichhardt Resources PEL expired in April this year but remained valid until a decision on renewal was made. Drilling company Planet Gas has a 50% interest in the licence area and is the company undertaking exploration drilling. The licence renewal if accepted by the company will mean the area from Sussex Inlet around Jervis Bay along the Shoalhaven River, Kangaroo Valley and up to Kiama will still be exposed to possible CSG exploration and future extraction (map attached).
The sensitive environmental and agricultural areas around the Shoalhaven is unsuitable to coal seam gas development given the potential groundwater contamination impacts and surface disruption.
The new policy and renewal offers for 22 licence areas around the state have been offered despite significant public opposition to CSG. Polling during the council elections showed 87% opposition to CSG in the Lismore area. A Galaxy Research poll (
http://www.jeremybuckingham.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Coal-Seam-Gas-Poll-Galaxy.pdf) conducted in August 2011 found 74% of people in NSW supported a moratorium on coal seam gas, with only 17% opposed.Ordinary Meeting-26 October 2012 Page 53
#
Background Documents (included in the Councillors Information Folder)
Planet Gas ASX announcement on PEL 469 licence renewal offer (
http://www.planetgas.com/index.cfm/linkservid/B9E33113-D8A9-56BC-03E903AB546D2A4F/showMeta/0/)
NSW Government’s Strategic Regional Land Use Policy overview (
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DkJI33ytuKs%3d&tabid=495&language=en-US)
Signed
Clr Findley
This motion failed to gain support it was only supported by Clr Patricia White and myself.
68. Managing requests for Men Sheds File 1753E
That Council liaise with the NSW government to establish a register of land appropriate for the use of Men’s Sheds within the Shoalhaven LGSA, and that be reported back to Council.
Background:
The Men’s Shed movement is building in popularity across NSW, with new sheds seeking to be established. One of the key issues to establishing a shed is the availability of land. Many sheds outgrow their humble beginnings on private property and seek the ability to expand and have secure tenure through utilising Crown Lands. The NSW Gov. has given an undertaking to assist the movement. The Ulladulla Men’s Shed is one such shed that is seeking to utilise crown land to facilitate secure tenure for their existing group. (Media release attached)
Signed
Clr Findley
this motion was supported by all Councillors.
Council work with the Wandandian Progress Association to assess the safety of the current location of the current bus stop, and the community desire to relocate it. Any subsequent budget issues be reported back to Council for consideration along with avenues for safety funding.
Background
The Wandandian progress association has brought to my attention their desire to relocate the current bus stop to safer location. This notice of motion seeks to start a formal process of negotiation with the community and affected stakeholders to seek a solution. It has also come to my attention that funding may be available through the roads safety officer for improved safety around bus stops, it is therefore the intent for any funding opportunities to be sought to complete any project that should come from the consultation.
Signed
Clr Findley
Supported by all Councillors
67. Strategic Regional Land Use Policy and zero protection for Shoalhaven Agricultural Land File 1753E
That Council:
1. Note the NSW Government’s renewal offer for PEL 469 which covers much of the Shoalhaven LGA.
2. Expresses its disappointment that the NSW Government’s Strategic Regional Land Use Policy has failed to deliver adequate protections for productive agricultural areas and sensitive environmental areas.
3. Makes clear its opposition to CSG development within the Shoalhaven LGA.
4. Expresses its interest in being actively consulted and involved in the updating of the South Coast Regional Strategy as highlighted in the new policy.
5. Calls on the NSW Government to release the scientific evidence relied upon to lift the moratorium on Fracking.
6. Calls on the NSW Government to give local councils a greater say over extractive industry activities within LGA’s.
7. Write to the NSW Planning and Infrastructure and Resources and Energy Ministers detailing these actions.
Background
The NSW Government has recently released its Strategic Regional Land Use Policy (
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DkJI33ytuKs%3d&tabid=495&language=en-US) , which in the words of many has effectively green-lighted the coal seam gas (CSG) industry in NSW. The NSW Farmers Association have stated they are "bitterly disappointed" (http://www.nswfarmers.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/79609/088.mr.12.pdf) by the policy and the NSW Irrigators Council is "profoundly disappointed" (http://www.nswic.org.au/pdf/press_release/2012/120911%20NSW.pdf).
The main concerns about the policy are that no areas are ruled out from coal mining or CSG development meaning all quality agricultural land is still exposed to possible mining and gas extraction. The proposed Aquifer Interference Regulation has been downgraded to a policy failing to adequately protect groundwater sources. The moratorium on hydraulic fracturing (Fracking) has also been lifted but none of the science relied on to justify this change in policy has been made public.
The policy also makes clear that the South Coast will not get its own Strategic Regional Land Use Plan, instead the Government has committed to updating our South Coast Regional Strategy. I am not aware of any consultation that has been undertaken by the NSW Government with Shoalhaven City Council in relation to this commitment.
# At the same time as the Government announced the new policy, it offered a renewal (
http://www.resources.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/443123/Proposed-petroleum-exploration-licence-offers-of-renewal.pdf) of the petroleum exploration licence (PEL) 469 that covers the Shoalhaven and Southern Highlands Local Government Area (LGA). The Leichhardt Resources PEL expired in April this year but remained valid until a decision on renewal was made. Drilling company Planet Gas has a 50% interest in the licence area and is the company undertaking exploration drilling. The licence renewal if accepted by the company will mean the area from Sussex Inlet around Jervis Bay along the Shoalhaven River, Kangaroo Valley and up to Kiama will still be exposed to possible CSG exploration and future extraction (map attached).
The sensitive environmental and agricultural areas around the Shoalhaven is unsuitable to coal seam gas development given the potential groundwater contamination impacts and surface disruption.
The new policy and renewal offers for 22 licence areas around the state have been offered despite significant public opposition to CSG. Polling during the council elections showed 87% opposition to CSG in the Lismore area. A Galaxy Research poll (
http://www.jeremybuckingham.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Coal-Seam-Gas-Poll-Galaxy.pdf) conducted in August 2011 found 74% of people in NSW supported a moratorium on coal seam gas, with only 17% opposed.Ordinary Meeting-26 October 2012 Page 53
#
Background Documents (included in the Councillors Information Folder)
Planet Gas ASX announcement on PEL 469 licence renewal offer (
http://www.planetgas.com/index.cfm/linkservid/B9E33113-D8A9-56BC-03E903AB546D2A4F/showMeta/0/)
NSW Government’s Strategic Regional Land Use Policy overview (
http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=DkJI33ytuKs%3d&tabid=495&language=en-US)
Signed
Clr Findley
This motion failed to gain support it was only supported by Clr Patricia White and myself.
68. Managing requests for Men Sheds File 1753E
That Council liaise with the NSW government to establish a register of land appropriate for the use of Men’s Sheds within the Shoalhaven LGSA, and that be reported back to Council.
Background:
The Men’s Shed movement is building in popularity across NSW, with new sheds seeking to be established. One of the key issues to establishing a shed is the availability of land. Many sheds outgrow their humble beginnings on private property and seek the ability to expand and have secure tenure through utilising Crown Lands. The NSW Gov. has given an undertaking to assist the movement. The Ulladulla Men’s Shed is one such shed that is seeking to utilise crown land to facilitate secure tenure for their existing group. (Media release attached)
Signed
Clr Findley
this motion was supported by all Councillors.
Soft Intimidation is still Intimidation ; Wells plays the soft glove in Gash's presence
Little bit of background for this story.
Prior to the Local Government Election, I met with Federal Member Joanna Gash to discuss the election and the passing of preferences.
Of course it would be extremely unlikely for The Greens to ever suggest that voters pass a preference to the Conservatives in politics regardless of the any claim of independence. They simply are not progressive enough.
One thing though the Mrs Gash and I did establish at that meeting was that we both didn't want to see Greg Watson resurrected as Mayor. I also told Mrs Gash that she didn't need to bother with preferences as her personal vote would be so high that no one else could really assist her- voila- 6 weeks later and Team Gash announced with a fanfare ' NO PREFERENCE DEALS!' which is such nonsense anyway as no one can give a preference other than a voter- Party's can make suggestions but it is the voter who ultimately decides. In Team Gash's fanfare they made out that The Greens had done some sort of dirty deal with Watson.
The Greens certainly don't make deals, but suggest to voters- well if you like us and we are unsuccessful the next best candidates are from party XYZ. We make these decisions with input from all our local group members,regardless of what any other group does.
At that meeting I also advised Mrs Gash that I would be a team player but as she well knows there are times when our ideologies will be so far apart the word team wont figure.
Little did I know that my definition of team player and Team Gash's was so different.
Deputy Mayor John Wells called me into the Mayoral office after committee a fortnight ago to discuss 'how I thought Council was going' and that he would tell me how 'he thought I was going'-woo hoo lucky me, my personal critic.
However when the office door closed behind me it was a different story and they immediately queried why I was supporting things written by Fiona Phillips. Fiona is well known for her stance during the election on Mrs Gash holding down her Federal Members job and that of Mayor.
They asked me since I had a problem with the Mayoral Minutes being bundled why didn't I say something to them- umm HELLO...Wells and Gash were both in the meeting when I discussed this issue at length and even raised the code of meeting practice that seemed to direct that the Mayoral minute should only address one issue ( there can be multiple minutes). Fiona Phillips attended this meeting also and astutely picked up the issue and wrote a blog piece on the issue. I reminded them both of this meeting.
Wells did actually ask me how I though things were going and why wasnt I being a team player....Mr Wells I was not elected onto Council via TEAM GASH and the community expect me to report issues on process and accountability to them not just roll over and play cute puppy for the sake of good relationships. In fact this questioning astounded me-two people well versed in the world of politics who seemed to equate team playing to NOT exposing the issues! That is the 'game' of politics....disagree on issues and remain civil and listen to your colleagues.
So once again I reiterated my version of team playing....reminding them of the expectation my constituients had.
Wells then went on to imply that somehow we had bargained and they had lived up to their bit by giving me chair of a few commitees (not major ones, but committees that they did not want to deal with)- this was a strange little veiled threat.
Finally Wells played a sympathy statement asking me to be kind as it was a stessfull time for Jo- he did apologise to Jo for doing so but I still found it a little strange.
It was an oddly executed session of intimidation and in an odd way I am thankfull for the hardening up that I have had to do over the last 4 years. I certianly wont be bowing to that sort of pressure anytime soon.
Prior to the Local Government Election, I met with Federal Member Joanna Gash to discuss the election and the passing of preferences.
Of course it would be extremely unlikely for The Greens to ever suggest that voters pass a preference to the Conservatives in politics regardless of the any claim of independence. They simply are not progressive enough.
One thing though the Mrs Gash and I did establish at that meeting was that we both didn't want to see Greg Watson resurrected as Mayor. I also told Mrs Gash that she didn't need to bother with preferences as her personal vote would be so high that no one else could really assist her- voila- 6 weeks later and Team Gash announced with a fanfare ' NO PREFERENCE DEALS!' which is such nonsense anyway as no one can give a preference other than a voter- Party's can make suggestions but it is the voter who ultimately decides. In Team Gash's fanfare they made out that The Greens had done some sort of dirty deal with Watson.
The Greens certainly don't make deals, but suggest to voters- well if you like us and we are unsuccessful the next best candidates are from party XYZ. We make these decisions with input from all our local group members,regardless of what any other group does.
At that meeting I also advised Mrs Gash that I would be a team player but as she well knows there are times when our ideologies will be so far apart the word team wont figure.
Little did I know that my definition of team player and Team Gash's was so different.
Deputy Mayor John Wells called me into the Mayoral office after committee a fortnight ago to discuss 'how I thought Council was going' and that he would tell me how 'he thought I was going'-woo hoo lucky me, my personal critic.
However when the office door closed behind me it was a different story and they immediately queried why I was supporting things written by Fiona Phillips. Fiona is well known for her stance during the election on Mrs Gash holding down her Federal Members job and that of Mayor.
They asked me since I had a problem with the Mayoral Minutes being bundled why didn't I say something to them- umm HELLO...Wells and Gash were both in the meeting when I discussed this issue at length and even raised the code of meeting practice that seemed to direct that the Mayoral minute should only address one issue ( there can be multiple minutes). Fiona Phillips attended this meeting also and astutely picked up the issue and wrote a blog piece on the issue. I reminded them both of this meeting.
Wells did actually ask me how I though things were going and why wasnt I being a team player....Mr Wells I was not elected onto Council via TEAM GASH and the community expect me to report issues on process and accountability to them not just roll over and play cute puppy for the sake of good relationships. In fact this questioning astounded me-two people well versed in the world of politics who seemed to equate team playing to NOT exposing the issues! That is the 'game' of politics....disagree on issues and remain civil and listen to your colleagues.
So once again I reiterated my version of team playing....reminding them of the expectation my constituients had.
Wells then went on to imply that somehow we had bargained and they had lived up to their bit by giving me chair of a few commitees (not major ones, but committees that they did not want to deal with)- this was a strange little veiled threat.
Finally Wells played a sympathy statement asking me to be kind as it was a stessfull time for Jo- he did apologise to Jo for doing so but I still found it a little strange.
It was an oddly executed session of intimidation and in an odd way I am thankfull for the hardening up that I have had to do over the last 4 years. I certianly wont be bowing to that sort of pressure anytime soon.
Arrogance, Ego, Fear and Loathing-make Berry Mga Mansion decision worse
Arrogance, Ego, Fear and Loathing-make Berry Mega Mansion decision worse
Berry residents were stunned at Shoalhaven City Councils Tuesday night development committee that gave the green light to a mega mansion for Borrowdale Close.
In a debate that was often heated and interrupted multiple times by the Team Gash, Chairperson Clr Patricia White, no amount of rational argument could sway the decision of the majority of Council.
Greens Councillor Amanda Findley said, ‘The debate centred around protecting the rural amenity of the this quiet corner of Berry from a mega mansion that is resort like in its proportions’.
Clrs Findley, Guile and Kitchener were the only Councillors not to support the mega mansion and gave a variety of reasons why the application should be refused.
‘The applicant submitted the same plans to Council on a previous occasion and they were rejected, Council staff helped pre-condition Councillors by advising that an appeal in the Land and Environment Court would be lost” said Clr Findley.
‘Councillors should not be frightened into supporting an application just because of the threat of going to court, the applicant has refused to negotiate a reduction in the size of the mega mansion in the past, the mega mansion is 1500sqm. The court would force Mr Battaglia to negotiate an outcome that was more satisfactory to all parties’ said Clr Findley.
However in Mrs Findley opinion Mr Battaglia’s negotiation with the Mayor and development staff was a cynical exercise that produced very little outcome.
“Mr Battaglia has since agreed to reduce the size of the mega mansion by 10% but on a development of this proportion its barely noticeable and this agreement was made only if the application was approved, and he would take the original application to court if council rejected it”.
Councillor Findley also has concerns that an emotionally driven decision was made based on personal politics.
‘Clr Guile argued vigorously for the community of Borrowdale Close, many of his comments were ruled out of order by the chair, who later commented to me that this type of debating didn’t help the community. I advised the chair that it was her job to make a decision on the facts not on the emotion, which she advised was a hard thing to do under the circumstances’.
It’s a real shame that Council cannot take into consideration further circumstances that could warrant a deferment of the project. Mr Battaglia has links to the construction company Southern Cross that has gone into receivership owing millions to their creditors. Many people in the Shoalhaven know the pain of not being paid by a head contractor and have sought assistance from Federal member and Mayor Mrs Gash.
Monday, November 26, 2012
Dubbo Local Government Conference- Success on small issues
I am a bit behind in sharing this little gem, but thought I would post it anyway.
Each year the Local Government Association NSW holds a conference which sets the policy direction and lobby points for the association for the year ahead. The Shires also turn up so its an interesting mix of City, Regional, Rural and normally attracts around 600+ folk- a third of which are voting delegates.
On the last Shoalhaven City Council, Liberal Councillor now State MP Gareth Ward always did his best to make sure I had no voting rights even though Shoalhaven Council has four votes- he tried to get all his mates the votes to help push the Conservatives agenda through as many organisations as possible.
The Liberals were successful at driving a One Association agenda- which isn't all bad except that they have made the voting system for that impossibly conservative and with no accountability for the first 12 months of the One Associations life- but that's a different story.
This story starts at Shoalhaven Council were I brought up a number of issues that were not supported at a Council level.
1, Asking the NSW Government to revoke all expired Coal Seam Gas Explorations licenses and committing to proper community consultation before reissue- This motion FAILED at Shoalhaven Council.
2. Requesting NSW Gov to conduct a risk assessment prior to proceeding with their Shooting in National Parks proposal and committing further funds to feral animal control- FAILED in Shoalhaven.
3. Referring the PlasBak silage wrap recycling programme for inclusion in Waste and Sustainability funding- WIN in Shoalhaven.
I was surprised when Ward and Co didn't try and kick the motions out before they even made it to Conference, but then they probably thought -Oh well they are the next Councils problems not ours!
When conference supported the Coal Seam Gas and PlasBak motions with only a few dissenting voices I was nicely surprised- The shooting in national parks motion was referred to the executive- so not entirely lost.
Buoyed by the success of a couple of motions I tried to pass some amendments- which really should have been addendum's and didn't receive support.
All in all I felt that I had a constructive time at the conference even though the chair was lousy and the news from the guest speakers for the gathered Councillors was all doom and gloom in regards to amalgamations and planning reforms.
Of course one of the highlights was catching up with Greens Councillors from around the State and getting to know the newly elected ones. It was also nice to make contact with Councillors from Wollongong so hopefully we can work together on progressive regional issues.
I always wonder why government is so behind and hasnt caught up with the sentiment of the people and sometimes its no different in local politics.
Each year the Local Government Association NSW holds a conference which sets the policy direction and lobby points for the association for the year ahead. The Shires also turn up so its an interesting mix of City, Regional, Rural and normally attracts around 600+ folk- a third of which are voting delegates.
On the last Shoalhaven City Council, Liberal Councillor now State MP Gareth Ward always did his best to make sure I had no voting rights even though Shoalhaven Council has four votes- he tried to get all his mates the votes to help push the Conservatives agenda through as many organisations as possible.
The Liberals were successful at driving a One Association agenda- which isn't all bad except that they have made the voting system for that impossibly conservative and with no accountability for the first 12 months of the One Associations life- but that's a different story.
This story starts at Shoalhaven Council were I brought up a number of issues that were not supported at a Council level.
1, Asking the NSW Government to revoke all expired Coal Seam Gas Explorations licenses and committing to proper community consultation before reissue- This motion FAILED at Shoalhaven Council.
2. Requesting NSW Gov to conduct a risk assessment prior to proceeding with their Shooting in National Parks proposal and committing further funds to feral animal control- FAILED in Shoalhaven.
3. Referring the PlasBak silage wrap recycling programme for inclusion in Waste and Sustainability funding- WIN in Shoalhaven.
I was surprised when Ward and Co didn't try and kick the motions out before they even made it to Conference, but then they probably thought -Oh well they are the next Councils problems not ours!
When conference supported the Coal Seam Gas and PlasBak motions with only a few dissenting voices I was nicely surprised- The shooting in national parks motion was referred to the executive- so not entirely lost.
Buoyed by the success of a couple of motions I tried to pass some amendments- which really should have been addendum's and didn't receive support.
All in all I felt that I had a constructive time at the conference even though the chair was lousy and the news from the guest speakers for the gathered Councillors was all doom and gloom in regards to amalgamations and planning reforms.
Of course one of the highlights was catching up with Greens Councillors from around the State and getting to know the newly elected ones. It was also nice to make contact with Councillors from Wollongong so hopefully we can work together on progressive regional issues.
I always wonder why government is so behind and hasnt caught up with the sentiment of the people and sometimes its no different in local politics.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Lack of Democracyy Part 2 : things could be getting better!
 |
| Just like me- things are looking Up |
In my last post on the Lack of Democracy, I was willing to give the benefit of doubt to the new Councillors and their inexperience as a way of explaining such pitiful debate on issues currently going to Council.
So I put in a 'John Fergusson' effort at tonight’s Policy and Resources meeting- I did pull up short of debating myself but there were many questions to be asked such as.....
Why didn’t Council report its in kind contribution to the local government election that was outsourced?
In the code of conduct does a mayoral minute cover one matter or one issue (I believe matter is in the single not plural)?
I argued that Councillors should have access to funding for good quality tertiary education that improved their performance as a Councillor ( went down like a lead balloon and I needed a ladder to get of my soap box :0 ) in the process accused Mayor Gash of pursuing a tit for tat against Cllr Guile...oops sorry!
Asked Cllr Watson not to amend his motion that would have Council decide on a preferred route for the new Shoalhaven River Crossing. (RMS are spending a $1 mill on this project as we speak)
Requested that when Councillors were given a tour of Alternative Waste Treatment facilities that they could actually be replicated in the Shoalhaven rather than hugely interesting facilities that process 1/2 a million peoples waste!
Argued that Council should phase out a policy that allows pensioners to get in arrears with their rates for up to 17 years without legal action!
And so it went on.......
Unfortunately for Cllr Wells who proclaimed that the meeting was taking too long because of my questions- I wasn’t about to stop- after all that’s why people voted me in!
It must have been catching because I think all of the Councillors present weighed in on at least one thing on tonight’s agenda.
Oh and to give the Mayor her due she did accommodate next year’s meeting time table back to Tuesdays! So Goodbye Friday night meetings except for June 2013.
Maybe things are looking up!
Monday, November 12, 2012
Huskisson:First Step in destroying urban design and village character.
Huskisson is a pretty special part of the South Coast.
Its known as the gateway to Jervis Bay, home of Dolphin Cruise boats, crystal clear waters and a marine park. Alongside it of course is the fantastic Booderee National park which by itself gets 1/2 million vistors per year.
For a council that has declared a desire to make our tourism industry its number one priority you would think that it would recognise what it is that makes the place special- in fact they paid a consultant to re-write their Tourism Master plan which did just that-identify our assets that are worth nurturing.
The tourism master plan did identify that the area was lacking in certain types of tourist development which included apartment style living for holiday makers. The Plan also identified that fostering our low key, laid back urban look was also part of the deal.
So planning for new development in Huskisson then becomes a priority-a priority that sympathises with the existing built environment and protecting view corridors through to the beach/water/vegetated foreshore. This has been successfully managed in other coastal locations that havent been hell bent on overdevelopment. For those places that went all out to attract big development are less desireable holiday locations, ( Shoalhaven by the way is the second best holiday destination in the State after Syndey!)
Fegen Street Huskisson has been a focal point lately for Huskisson as it has a draft Development Control Plan on exhibition, that up untill Wednesday aimed to preserve a sensitive urban design approach. The plan has taken four years of consultation with quite a lot of movement from the basically urban community that surrounds the precinct.
Meanwhile since the plan was first drafted a global financial crisis intervened and of course has effected real estate prices and the willingness of financial institutions to lend money for more speculative projects.
With these conditions in mind a prospective developer for Fegen Street has fought the community tooth and nail to try and acheive a higher density of development for his site's on Fegen Street. One of his applications was outright refused by the joint regional planning panel as it just didnt suit the urban nature of the area.
Current Mayor and Federal Member Joanna Gash turned up to a community onsite meeting and was faced with a mob of concerned citizens who put up balloons oniste to show just how four storey buildings would affect them. Mrs Gash at the time stated that she supported the community.
However at Wednesdays Development Committee with barely a word said in debate and after a passionate plea from community members Mrs Gash moved a motion that would see the development control plan for the Fegen Street Precinct altered to allow a fourth storey. It may be a trimmed down 4th storey in that it is only allowed to be half the size of the first floor but it is still a 4th storey.
Of course the community are disappointed, and the developer is happy that the gates are opened to allow something that doesnt fit with the village feel of Huskisson but lifts his proft margin from 17% to 35% which in his words is now a viable project.
I didnt get to support the community at committee level as I was of at another Council endorsed activity and thought it was safe to remain at the Conference and AGM ( I was Shoalhavens voting delegate) as I could debate the issue on the floor of Council- but with the new delegated powers of committee that is not to be. so we have a major policy decision made in the quite corner of a committee withour being referred to a full Council ( SHAME SHOALHAVEN SHAME).
Thanks however to Clrs McCruddin and Guile who also believe in democracy and have supported a recission motion so that this major policy issue can be reported to full Council. It might not be successfull though as it has to go first to development and get the support of the voting Majority of TEAM GASH.
Oh and special thanks to Clr Anstiss who must have read the report, looked at the back history and decided to support the community who elected her.
Its known as the gateway to Jervis Bay, home of Dolphin Cruise boats, crystal clear waters and a marine park. Alongside it of course is the fantastic Booderee National park which by itself gets 1/2 million vistors per year.
For a council that has declared a desire to make our tourism industry its number one priority you would think that it would recognise what it is that makes the place special- in fact they paid a consultant to re-write their Tourism Master plan which did just that-identify our assets that are worth nurturing.
The tourism master plan did identify that the area was lacking in certain types of tourist development which included apartment style living for holiday makers. The Plan also identified that fostering our low key, laid back urban look was also part of the deal.
So planning for new development in Huskisson then becomes a priority-a priority that sympathises with the existing built environment and protecting view corridors through to the beach/water/vegetated foreshore. This has been successfully managed in other coastal locations that havent been hell bent on overdevelopment. For those places that went all out to attract big development are less desireable holiday locations, ( Shoalhaven by the way is the second best holiday destination in the State after Syndey!)
Fegen Street Huskisson has been a focal point lately for Huskisson as it has a draft Development Control Plan on exhibition, that up untill Wednesday aimed to preserve a sensitive urban design approach. The plan has taken four years of consultation with quite a lot of movement from the basically urban community that surrounds the precinct.
Meanwhile since the plan was first drafted a global financial crisis intervened and of course has effected real estate prices and the willingness of financial institutions to lend money for more speculative projects.
With these conditions in mind a prospective developer for Fegen Street has fought the community tooth and nail to try and acheive a higher density of development for his site's on Fegen Street. One of his applications was outright refused by the joint regional planning panel as it just didnt suit the urban nature of the area.
Current Mayor and Federal Member Joanna Gash turned up to a community onsite meeting and was faced with a mob of concerned citizens who put up balloons oniste to show just how four storey buildings would affect them. Mrs Gash at the time stated that she supported the community.
However at Wednesdays Development Committee with barely a word said in debate and after a passionate plea from community members Mrs Gash moved a motion that would see the development control plan for the Fegen Street Precinct altered to allow a fourth storey. It may be a trimmed down 4th storey in that it is only allowed to be half the size of the first floor but it is still a 4th storey.
Of course the community are disappointed, and the developer is happy that the gates are opened to allow something that doesnt fit with the village feel of Huskisson but lifts his proft margin from 17% to 35% which in his words is now a viable project.
I didnt get to support the community at committee level as I was of at another Council endorsed activity and thought it was safe to remain at the Conference and AGM ( I was Shoalhavens voting delegate) as I could debate the issue on the floor of Council- but with the new delegated powers of committee that is not to be. so we have a major policy decision made in the quite corner of a committee withour being referred to a full Council ( SHAME SHOALHAVEN SHAME).
Thanks however to Clrs McCruddin and Guile who also believe in democracy and have supported a recission motion so that this major policy issue can be reported to full Council. It might not be successfull though as it has to go first to development and get the support of the voting Majority of TEAM GASH.
Oh and special thanks to Clr Anstiss who must have read the report, looked at the back history and decided to support the community who elected her.
Lack of Democracy: hopefully just a dose of forst time nerves
Well this 'new' Council is a little bizarre.
At the very first Ordinary meeting general manager Russ Pigg changed a couple of words around that not even us seasoned Councillors picked up, which delegated authority to the Committee's. Meaning that a decision of a Committee is now the final decision and there is no further debate.
I know the following explanation sounds a little odd but stick with me.
In the previous Council a recommendation would be made at committee and then referred to the full Council for ratification. This allowed for the committee process to be a little less formal and be a 'working' meeting that ironed out any problems and find common ground for solutions. If the items warrant contentious they usually got passed without debate at the Ordinary Council meeting.
The Ordinary Council meeting is the only meeting that Councillors are impelled to go to- it is a part time / voluntary job after all. Besides Council sometimes books different Councillors out to do other things for the city making it impossible for them to attend the committee meeting. Also life outside of Council can sometimes get in the way- especially if you are employed full time.
Delegated authority isn't all bad if the item is a small item, a slight variation on a policy position, a motion seeking direction for staff, but big issues like the budget and policy decision's with a long term impact should be referred to the Ordinary meeting of Council.
The seasoned Councillors tried their best to get this situation amended to at least give a second chance to debating big issues, but this was voted down by TEAM GASH.
And so the log jams begin, because instead of delegated authority making things more streamlined and supposedly quicker which in Gash language equates to 'getting the job done'. Councillors now have to submit a recession motion with two other Councillors signing it, wait a month for it to come back to committee to see if its successfully instead of just bringing the item up to the next Ordinary meeting which is generally only a fortnight away.
So we have our Mayor and TEAM GASH being stubborn and not collegiate in this issue.
Which brings me to the issue I raised previously- The Mayors insistence on lumping multiple issue into one mayoral minute- sounds efficient- but its not - it has the same effect as delegated authority and 'hides' issues in what seems like an innocuous report. The October meeting was a great example and rolled back the Councils position of not supporting poker machines rolled into a motion that supported community groups- very poor form and not at all accountable.
TEAM GASH must have an opinion on the multiple issues that come to Council, but their desire for a speedy meeting means that we are seeing very little debate from them at all.
So I hope that its all first time nerves which shouldn't last the rest of this term. It is the same in committee, complex issues with very little questioning of the staff. For me that is exactly why I was elected - to ask questions and make sure the outcomes are the best they can possibly be.
Right now I am awaiting the outcome of a recession motion that could have been dealt with at the ordinary meeting in a fortnight on Development Control Plan 99- The development control plan is another issue so I will for a separate post.
ill keep you posted or else turn up to a Council meeting and watch the lack of debate and the hesitance of TEAM GASH's voting hands which only seem to go up like a Mexican wave-waiting to see what the TEAM member next is doing on the issue.
At the very first Ordinary meeting general manager Russ Pigg changed a couple of words around that not even us seasoned Councillors picked up, which delegated authority to the Committee's. Meaning that a decision of a Committee is now the final decision and there is no further debate.
I know the following explanation sounds a little odd but stick with me.
In the previous Council a recommendation would be made at committee and then referred to the full Council for ratification. This allowed for the committee process to be a little less formal and be a 'working' meeting that ironed out any problems and find common ground for solutions. If the items warrant contentious they usually got passed without debate at the Ordinary Council meeting.
The Ordinary Council meeting is the only meeting that Councillors are impelled to go to- it is a part time / voluntary job after all. Besides Council sometimes books different Councillors out to do other things for the city making it impossible for them to attend the committee meeting. Also life outside of Council can sometimes get in the way- especially if you are employed full time.
Delegated authority isn't all bad if the item is a small item, a slight variation on a policy position, a motion seeking direction for staff, but big issues like the budget and policy decision's with a long term impact should be referred to the Ordinary meeting of Council.
The seasoned Councillors tried their best to get this situation amended to at least give a second chance to debating big issues, but this was voted down by TEAM GASH.
And so the log jams begin, because instead of delegated authority making things more streamlined and supposedly quicker which in Gash language equates to 'getting the job done'. Councillors now have to submit a recession motion with two other Councillors signing it, wait a month for it to come back to committee to see if its successfully instead of just bringing the item up to the next Ordinary meeting which is generally only a fortnight away.
So we have our Mayor and TEAM GASH being stubborn and not collegiate in this issue.
Which brings me to the issue I raised previously- The Mayors insistence on lumping multiple issue into one mayoral minute- sounds efficient- but its not - it has the same effect as delegated authority and 'hides' issues in what seems like an innocuous report. The October meeting was a great example and rolled back the Councils position of not supporting poker machines rolled into a motion that supported community groups- very poor form and not at all accountable.
TEAM GASH must have an opinion on the multiple issues that come to Council, but their desire for a speedy meeting means that we are seeing very little debate from them at all.
So I hope that its all first time nerves which shouldn't last the rest of this term. It is the same in committee, complex issues with very little questioning of the staff. For me that is exactly why I was elected - to ask questions and make sure the outcomes are the best they can possibly be.
Right now I am awaiting the outcome of a recession motion that could have been dealt with at the ordinary meeting in a fortnight on Development Control Plan 99- The development control plan is another issue so I will for a separate post.
ill keep you posted or else turn up to a Council meeting and watch the lack of debate and the hesitance of TEAM GASH's voting hands which only seem to go up like a Mexican wave-waiting to see what the TEAM member next is doing on the issue.
Thursday, November 8, 2012
North Nowra Link Road
The North Nowra Link Road plan has been around since I was a wee little girl 1974 to be exact.
The plan has been hotly contested since the 1980s as a route started to crystallise, Shoalhaven City Council created 3 options that all cut through the Bomaderry Regional Park, Southern, Central and Western.
The Central according to council gave the best cost benefit outcome and suposedly would help ease traffic conditions at the infamous intersection where Illaroo Road meets the Princes Hwy.
The central route however has the worst environmental outcome as it ploughs through the centre of the park and through habitat of the irreplaceable Bomaderry Ziera ( one of the threatened species that calls the park home). Campaigners, Terry Barratt and Robin Moyes would have to be THE community experts on this issue, over the years they have split the tasks Terry taking on the environmental aspects and Robin the traffic aspects.
In one of the turn arounds of the century and a very clever politcail move by now Mayor Jo Gash, saw Jo Gash rescind her previous pledge of support for the central route and shift to the less damageing western route. This route is more pallatable to campaigners- it has more tree loss but doesnt interfere with the critical habitat.
So when a report came to Council in regards to The Friends of Bomaderry Creek petition saying no to the central route- it was time to take some decisive action and start the ball rolling to abandon the central route once and for all.
Of course this was going to be a rocky road- Clr Watson was not going to let go easily after 30 years of beleiving in this project. First their was the recission motion on the committee recommendation- then there was the recission on the Ordinary meeting recommendation. All of that in a hail storm of he- said- she said- politicking and it seems that final a resolution of Council to support the west Cambewarra Parrallel alignment will be taken to the Planning Minister.
So its a win- hard to tell if its a lasting one but at least its been a statement of committment to getting a better outcome for Bomaderry Regional Park.
The plan has been hotly contested since the 1980s as a route started to crystallise, Shoalhaven City Council created 3 options that all cut through the Bomaderry Regional Park, Southern, Central and Western.
The Central according to council gave the best cost benefit outcome and suposedly would help ease traffic conditions at the infamous intersection where Illaroo Road meets the Princes Hwy.
The central route however has the worst environmental outcome as it ploughs through the centre of the park and through habitat of the irreplaceable Bomaderry Ziera ( one of the threatened species that calls the park home). Campaigners, Terry Barratt and Robin Moyes would have to be THE community experts on this issue, over the years they have split the tasks Terry taking on the environmental aspects and Robin the traffic aspects.
In one of the turn arounds of the century and a very clever politcail move by now Mayor Jo Gash, saw Jo Gash rescind her previous pledge of support for the central route and shift to the less damageing western route. This route is more pallatable to campaigners- it has more tree loss but doesnt interfere with the critical habitat.
So when a report came to Council in regards to The Friends of Bomaderry Creek petition saying no to the central route- it was time to take some decisive action and start the ball rolling to abandon the central route once and for all.
Of course this was going to be a rocky road- Clr Watson was not going to let go easily after 30 years of beleiving in this project. First their was the recission motion on the committee recommendation- then there was the recission on the Ordinary meeting recommendation. All of that in a hail storm of he- said- she said- politicking and it seems that final a resolution of Council to support the west Cambewarra Parrallel alignment will be taken to the Planning Minister.
So its a win- hard to tell if its a lasting one but at least its been a statement of committment to getting a better outcome for Bomaderry Regional Park.
Thursday, October 4, 2012
New Council, First Meeting.
So the new Mayor has been robed and chained to office and the new Councillors all have their name badges- I don't think the dust has by any means settled but the first Ordinary meeting has set the ball rolling for this term of Council.
It was an interesting agenda with a few curly ones thrown in for good measure. I think that the Council covered all types of meeting procedures in the one meeting!
Its a real shame though that Team Gash couldn't cut through their pre-programed responses and support a simple procedural motion that would have helped the meeting along.
The Mayor had presented a multi recommendation motion that some Councillors simply wanted to vote on each part of individually. The Team Gash machine voted down a procedural motion that I put up in an attempt to make things happen with less stress. Is this a sign of things to come ie. block voting or was it just first night nerves, I hope it was nerves.
Clr Guile also made an impression in the business paper- it has been alleged that he has falsely claimed on his travel allowance,and to add to the case the Minister for Local government gave a directive to Council not to deal with any conduct issues in the lead up to elections.
Releasing the information prior to the election may have had an impact on the election outcome.
So the new Council is left to pick up the pieces in the aftermath of the election and have put forward a strong recommendation to deal with Clr Guiles issue. Basically its a good proposal that gives the opportunity to Clr Guile to deal with the issue in a clear and concise manner.
I contributed to the motion on Guile by requesting that Council seek information under freedom of information in regards to the ministers decision to put out the directive that possibly aided in Clr Guiles reelection- mind you other Clrs have in the past been investigated and still were reelected.
A couple of things happened during the Councils caretaker period and on the first business day after the election that I thought warranted a urgency motion be brought to Councils first meeting.
1. The State Government renewed the minerals exploration licence over the Shoalhaven which opens the way for coal seam gas on our prime agricultural land and land within the Sydney Water drinking catchment- the licence covers a good chunk on land within the Shoalhaven. The State Governments Strategic Land Use Plan does nothing to help protect quality lands within the Shoalhaven.
2.The NSW State Government ditched compulsory planning for sea level rise and committed to allowing private property owners to build their own protection measures.
You can stick your head in the sand but it doesn't take away Governments responsibility to look after its citizenry and future populations via good land use planning.
Both these issues have huge implications for Shoalhaven and need to be addressed early in this term of Council- however the new Council didn't think they were significant enough to bring on as urgency items. So we wait until the October meeting to debate the motion and hopefully support a position that gives the NSW State Government a stern ticking of for once again excluding the community on these important issues.
It was an interesting agenda with a few curly ones thrown in for good measure. I think that the Council covered all types of meeting procedures in the one meeting!
Its a real shame though that Team Gash couldn't cut through their pre-programed responses and support a simple procedural motion that would have helped the meeting along.
The Mayor had presented a multi recommendation motion that some Councillors simply wanted to vote on each part of individually. The Team Gash machine voted down a procedural motion that I put up in an attempt to make things happen with less stress. Is this a sign of things to come ie. block voting or was it just first night nerves, I hope it was nerves.
Clr Guile also made an impression in the business paper- it has been alleged that he has falsely claimed on his travel allowance,and to add to the case the Minister for Local government gave a directive to Council not to deal with any conduct issues in the lead up to elections.
Releasing the information prior to the election may have had an impact on the election outcome.
So the new Council is left to pick up the pieces in the aftermath of the election and have put forward a strong recommendation to deal with Clr Guiles issue. Basically its a good proposal that gives the opportunity to Clr Guile to deal with the issue in a clear and concise manner.
I contributed to the motion on Guile by requesting that Council seek information under freedom of information in regards to the ministers decision to put out the directive that possibly aided in Clr Guiles reelection- mind you other Clrs have in the past been investigated and still were reelected.
A couple of things happened during the Councils caretaker period and on the first business day after the election that I thought warranted a urgency motion be brought to Councils first meeting.
1. The State Government renewed the minerals exploration licence over the Shoalhaven which opens the way for coal seam gas on our prime agricultural land and land within the Sydney Water drinking catchment- the licence covers a good chunk on land within the Shoalhaven. The State Governments Strategic Land Use Plan does nothing to help protect quality lands within the Shoalhaven.
2.The NSW State Government ditched compulsory planning for sea level rise and committed to allowing private property owners to build their own protection measures.
You can stick your head in the sand but it doesn't take away Governments responsibility to look after its citizenry and future populations via good land use planning.
Both these issues have huge implications for Shoalhaven and need to be addressed early in this term of Council- however the new Council didn't think they were significant enough to bring on as urgency items. So we wait until the October meeting to debate the motion and hopefully support a position that gives the NSW State Government a stern ticking of for once again excluding the community on these important issues.
Wednesday, October 3, 2012
Funding Cuts to education the worst form of Scoial and Economic engineering
Ive been pretty mad at the State Gov in regards to their funding cuts to education so I fired of this press release to the local media outlets- unfortunately they only wanted to talk about "really important news" like what day the Council meetings are to be held- no wonder our society is getting so dulled that commentators are sayng the NSW Gov has no choice other than to cut school funding!!!!!! Wake Up Australia
The Worst Form of Social and Economic Engineering.
The State Governments latest funding cuts attacking schools has been labelled “the worst form of social and economic engineering” by the Shoalhaven Greens.
“ The Public Education System has been under attack by the Liberals sine the Howard years as part of their extreme ideology to privatise as much as possible and minimise government responsibility” said spokesperson and Greens Clr Amanda Findley.
“Education needs to be left out of their slash and burn agenda”.
“Extreme Liberals believe they are the world’s economic saviours, but their short sighted policies have driven a skills shortage, a crisis in education policy. If we want an Australia with a small tax base, slashing education funding will achieve this” said Mrs Findley.
Quality public funded education available for the poor, rich, disabled and mentally challenged is the best equaliser the country has and the best opportunity to inspire new enterprise and provide a well-educated workforce to contribute to our future tax base,
In Australia we to create a new generation of well-paid people to support the challenges created by an aging population reliant on public healthcare.
Australia is a wealthy country, even though the Liberals, convince us daily that it is otherwise. Yet we have a poor global performance in education outcomes.
At a weekend P and C meeting advising the region about funding changes a Liberal Party Stalwart seemed genuinely appalled at the situation with schools funding.
How many other Liberal voters don’t understand Liberal ideology that supports big business running the country and less government responsibility?
The population needs to mobilise on this issue and send a clear message to the NSW Liberals, when it comes to public education we want the best for Aussie kids and they need to stop their extreme pandering to their friends and wealthy proprietors.
Amanda Findley- Shoalhaven Greens
Friday, September 14, 2012
Submission on Green Paper
Hi All,
I dislike doing rushed submissions and its not as well researched as I might have liked it to be, but I couldnt let the deadline go without making a few comments on the Green paper on planning. Hopefully there are a lot more submissions which tackle the detail and that mine is an added 'voice' to the resounding sound of community seeking greater input rather than being blocked out.
_______________________________________________________________________________
I dislike doing rushed submissions and its not as well researched as I might have liked it to be, but I couldnt let the deadline go without making a few comments on the Green paper on planning. Hopefully there are a lot more submissions which tackle the detail and that mine is an added 'voice' to the resounding sound of community seeking greater input rather than being blocked out.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Dear Co- Chairs,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on Planning Review:
Green Paper and for providing “A review of International Best Practice in
Planning Law”. I encourage you to adopt all of the measures that are provided
in the ‘Summary of Best Practices, as I believe they will go a long way in
making any planning law reform more meaningful.
As a Councillor on Shoalhaven City Council, I am concerned
that the State will continue to cost shift back to Council and I encourage the
Chair to make a recommendation that the legislation embody a financial
contribution from the State for plan making.
Developer contributions are also an important part of
infrastructure delivery in regional Councils and this scheme needs to be
retained and if not a legislated commitment to perhaps a tax dividend needs to
be incorporated to give local Councils more confidence in financial
contributions.
Ecologically sustainable development principles should remain
a key aspect of any new planning instrument and that a clear definition of ESD
is provided and is enforceable by local planning authorities.
Climate Change and Sea Level Rise, for Coastal Councils. These
issues come with a huge community cost implication – put simply local Councils
need firm assistance with this type of planning. The recent abandonment of the
draft sea level rise policy is a poor policy decision and this needs to be
turned around in any new plan.
The review is lacking in detail on how Community
Consultation will be undertaken, in advancing the issue to the next level more detail
needs to be incorporated and then legislated- it’s not acceptable that loose
statements open to interpretation in regards to consultation become part of the
legislation. Even though it seems that upfront consultation will take the
conflict out of land use planning, this could only be possible in a planning
world that created documents that encapsulate the communities desire AND
provided a third party appeal mechanism should an individual development have a
negative social and environmental impact. Merit based assessment does not
fulfil this objective. The time between initial consultation and actual project
delivery will create a disconnect between plan making and building, this has
the potential to drive conflict.
I do hope that the environment will be given the highest
priority for protection, good quality natural and built environments are what
create Australia’s unique character and we cannot jeopardises that for the sake
of developer driven plan making.
Amanda Findley
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Recycling Silage Wrap a great innovative way to get plastic from Landfill
 |
| Amanda with members of DIG , David Walker , Kyleigh Cochrane ,Craig Tate and Ed George from Plasback |
Recently I got to attend the Dairy Industry Group (DIG) meeting which was hosting a rep from Tapex / PlasBack to discuss silage wrap and bailing twine recycling.
Silage wrap is a bit of a problem especially in winter when vast amounts of silage is used to help keep cattle in condition over winter.
For the non country reader silage wrap is the plastic that covers grass or other harvested material to keep it from breaking down the harvested product is kept for feed in hard times
 |
| A familiar sight in farming districts- silage bales of feed stored and ready for use |
Tapex is a producer of silage wrap and twine and have created an extended producer program called PlasBack.The main aim of PlasBack is to up cycle used wrap into other useful products.
The farmer needs to purchase bags which are made of the same plastic composite as the wrap but a bit tougher, fill the bag, collect a truck full and deliver to Nowra or Ulladulla waste transfer stations. The PlasBack semi comes and takes the bags away- compress' them for transportation into bales. The bales are then sent for recycling- they make a small range of products that have agricultural uses.
I was so impressed with this system that I went back to Council and sought support to give some seed funding to farmers for purchasing the plastic bags. Council supported the seed funding of $5000 from the waste fund so hopefully that will help kick start the program in this area.
I also sent my motion to other Councillor in Wingecarrabie and Kiama seeking cross regional support.
The idea behind the seed funding is help dilute the cost to farmers during the important habit changing phase. With less waste going to Landfill that's less waste levy going to the NSW State Government and more money staying locally for projects in the Shoalhaven.
Good on Tapex for taking extended producer responsibility seriously and not waiting for legislation to force them to do something.
 |
| With Dave Walker - The bin I'm touching is made from recycled silage wrap and with a bag inside it becomes a storage container to bag up old wrap. |
2012 National Year of Reading
 |
| Amanda and Kerrie Whittaker Photo Courtesy of R Sharpe. |
Last week I was invited to read to pre schooler's to mark reading week as part of Year of Reading celebrations. Of course I really looked forward to reading to the small ones- its been a while since my girls have enjoyed mum's tales.
I was supposed to be reading a book from my childhood that had an impact, but I just couldn't think of one that would suit pre-schoolers, so I choose a book that my girls really liked, the Dr Seuss tale of The Lorax.
Tannar especially loved Seuss- I cant remember how many times I read, Green Eggs and Ham, I wish that I had duck feet, The Lorax, Bears Picnic, the fun rhyming and corny words all with some accent of course.
When I was part of Landcare we ended up gifting several copies of The Lorax to Shoalhaven Libraries, that was a while ago long before big Hollywood got its hands on the tale.
I think the preschoolers enjoyed the reading- they were quiet and attentive, and to me they were a welcome break from campaigning and a good reminder why I started on a political journey in the first place.
Reading has changed a lot since Tom and Jane readers. Fabulous picture books and graphic novels mean that reading isn't just about words. The non-word reader can now enjoy reading as much as old fashioned book worms can. Check out the Shoalhaven Libraries for graphic books by Sean Tan and Jeanie Baker and others- they may look like kids books but they are packed with multiple layers of meaning and await your quiet contemplation.
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Natural Burials-trial to end- but further consultation just in case.
One of the intiatives I put forward to Council was the concept of natural burials- its a small but niche market and one that takes a little time to catch on. Some of the Councillors were not to keen on the idea but agreed to a trial. If anyone feels inspired to go along to this discussion the bereavement services manager is very good and quite funny.
Council to host natural burial information session
“Despite a
number of inquiries and strong support from cross sections of the community,
there have been no requests for natural burial during the two year trial
period.
|
|
Media
Release
|
10 August 2012
Council to host natural burial information session
Shoalhaven
City Council will be hosting a natural burial information session following the
Shoalhaven Memorial Gardens and Lawn Cemetery’s two year trial into the
practice.
There has been substantial community interest in natural burial, a
practice that sees the deceased prepared without the use of embalming fluid or
chemical preservatives.
The body
is then placed in a biodegradable coffin and laid to rest in a shallow grave,
allowing the process to mimic composting.
A trial
‘natural burial portion’ was established at the Shoalhaven Memorial Gardens and
Lawn Cemetery following Council’s decision to implement a two year natural
burial trial in October 2010.
Shoalhaven
City Council Director of City Services and Operations, Bill Paterson said that
with the two year trial period almost complete, Council will be reporting the
outcomes back to Council in November.
“Throughout
the two year trial period, Council’s Bereavement Services Unit have extensively
engaged with both the local and wider community through a variety of workshops,
information sessions and open days at the Memorial Gardens,” said Mr Paterson.
“To assist
in the preparation of the report back to Council and further gauge public
opinion regarding this service, Council will be hosting a further information
session regarding the provision of natural burials within the Shoalhaven.”
“This
information session will provide local residents the opportunity to ask
questions and receive further information about natural burials.”
“I would
strongly recommend anyone interested in natural burials to attend the upcoming
information session.”
The
natural burial information session will be held at the Shoalhaven Memorial
Gardens and Lawn Cemetery, Worrigee from 3pm on Wednesday 22 August.
CONTACT: Director of City Services and Operations,
Bill Paterson - 4429 3298
Thursday, July 26, 2012
Shoalhaven First- or Liberals Shoalhaven- how truthful is the representation
So Liberal party member Andrew Guile is fashioning himself as a
community campaigner the following is how the press reported his groups launch.
I want to deconstruct what he has to say- so will intersperse this with my own
commentary which is the blue text.
A FIFTH candidate has nominated
in the battle to become Shoalhaven mayor at the September 8 local government
election.
Shoalhaven City Council’s deputy
mayor for the past year, Cr Andrew Guile, has thrown his hat in the ring
alongside Crs Greg Watson, Amanda Findley and John Fergusson, and Gilmore MP
Joanna Gash.
Cr Guile yesterday announced his
intentions to stand under the banner of Shoalhaven First – described as a group
of financially conservative local residents committed to putting the Shoalhaven’s
needs first.
So how does financial conservative put the needs of Shoalhaven first. On
Council Guile represents himself just like the state party an example of this
is in budget setting. We need a million dollars for the roads- well staff just
go away and find it and report back how you are going to do it- taking no real
responsibility for cutting particular services. We are seeing this blunt
methodology being applied by the state equally the loss of public service jobs.
“After four years serving our community
as a councillor and now deputy mayor, I am even more committed to seeing the
Shoalhaven become the best place to live and work,” Cr Guile said.
Sure we are all committed in our own way, but with Guile it’s his way or
the highway-a born to rule approach. In a recent radio interview he declared
that he would get on with the North Nowra link road regardless of who ’dare’s
get in his way’- a threatening and non conciliatory approach.
He planned to introduce “a very
positive plan for the future of this great city”, based on five-points.
The priorities included fighting
for a safer Shoalhaven community, having an honest, accountable and transparent
council, easing cost of living by keeping rates low while strengthening the
local economy, revitalising business areas and community facilities throughout
the Shoalhaven, and preserving and protecting our local environment.
Let’s unpack this five point plan. In Liberal speak a safer community
means more CCTV surveillance, more policing (which Shoalhaven Council has no
control over) and more alcohol free zones. All populist policies that appeal to
dare I say it “older conservatives”. CCTV costs the public purse and does
nothing to get to the source of social unrest. Putting the same amount of
funding into community development doesn’t have the same public appeal but has
the ability to make a real difference for people’s lives.
An honest, accountable and transparent council….REALLY!!! I have to pick
myself of the floor from laughing hard at this one and ask is this the same
Andrew Guile who sat in a committee meeting of council and moved a motion to
NOT press police charges against persons within Council who had carried out an
orchestrated theft from Council. The same Andrew Guile who refused to have ICAC
matters from the last four years made public at my request.
Easing the cost of living by keeping rates low. Now this I have a real
problem with because as Mr Guile makes election promises the cash register is
cha-chinging away in the background or perhaps he should be more ‘honest and
transparent’ and tell us which services he will cut or increase the fees off to achieve the wanted outcome. In the past
Shoalhaven residents have supported targeted rate increases where the rate
increase has only been spent on a particular item such as drainage. The
collective Shoalhaven ‘we” should not be afraid to discuss our rates and if we
need to , agree to increased rates for special projects. Just like the home
budget Council relies on rates to achieve outcomes for the city and none of us
can expect our rates to stagnate and make our city fall behind.
Revitalising business areas and community facilities throughout the
Shoalhaven- I don’t have much of a problem with this statement- in fact it may
be the one area Guile and I agree on- Shoalhaven should focus on maintenance of
its existing facilities work out ways to improve them so that they service
increasing demand.
Preserving and protecting our environment……um which environment is that
Guile…I think you must be referring to the ‘built’ environment because you
can’t possibly mean the ‘natural’ ‘pristine’ environments of the Shoalhaven
that the rest of think of when we use the E word. Guile has used the last 4
years to systematically attack environmental policies in the Shoalhaven. The
most recent was an attack on the tree preservation order and removing
biodiversity mapping, and habitat corridors in the draft local environment
plan.
Cr Guile said the initiatives
would “put Shoalhaven residents first”.
Just like he has during the last four years on Council (sarcastic voice).
During Local Environment planning meetings Guile has treated members of the
public with contempt and in my opinion has only put the ‘residents first’ when
they agree with his point of view.
With the guiding policies, Cr
Guile also committed to avoid slander, characterisations and petty politics.
Read, but that won’t stop me from using my mate Gareth Ward to do the
dirty work for me!
Many people have commentated to me that the last four years have been
highly politicised for a regional council. Personally I’ve taken a fair bit of
Guile and Ward’s characterisations and petty politics and then told to ‘man up’
for ‘that’s what it’s all about’. Leopards don’t change their spots and
Liberals can call themselves Shoalhaven or Family First but it won’t change
their underlying ideology.
“Instead, Shoalhaven First will
be promoting a positive agenda that will build on the success of the last four
years and make a better community,” he said.
While many people criticised
council and the Shoalhaven, “It’s not about the problems, it’s about how we
come up with solutions,” Cr Guile said.“This is what Shoalhaven First is about, providing a positive vision for the future of this great city and supplying young, energetic and capable candidates that will see these plans become a reality.”
Cr Guile will be standing in ward one along with fellow Shoalhaven First candidates, former Shoalhaven Young Citizen of the Year and law and commerce student Paul Ell, North Nowra businesswoman Serena Copley and Bomaderry music teacher and mother of Kiama MP Gareth Ward, Margaret Bowcher.
In ward two the Shoalhaven First
candidates are Nowra East Public School teacher’s aide Brad Payne, who is
studying to become a primary school teacher, South Nowra businessman and
councillor for the past four years David Bennett, retailer Adam Carney and
another person studying to be a teacher, 2011 Nowra Showgirl Natasha Larter.
Shoalhaven First is still putting
together a ticket for ward three.
The article was copied directly
from the South Coast Register 25 July 2012, the commentary on the article is my
opinion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Shelter to Close it doors as letter requesting more rentals goes out.
Salt Care - follow link to see their services I received the sad news that our local homeless shelter needs to close it's doors on Sund...
-
Now for the truth! Below is the follow up piece that the paper printed. But what they feared to print goes like this. On Monday night, ...
-
Image taken from https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiOoK_4eC7eveq1F9hgfkUrK44Gnq0tmEp6KFvQST97s1Fp_Cg4nGM1gPZsJPXW... -
"It is customary to acknowledge country and I do so by paying our respects to elders past and present and acknowledge all people wh...